November 30, 2010 3:24 PM

Would you call this corporate collaboration? It is an interesting approach/ combination of basic design principles with ideation and entrepreneurship. While in design school I can remember seeking out team members that I thought were the most like me because I assumed they would be the easiest to work with. What I later discovered it that we often times would produce one dimensional solutions that were well received by others like us, but not necessarily the whole class. I see this now as a very similar response to your point about concepts not always being well received because the new party was not part of the design/ ideation process.
The most interesting point to this article for me is the emphasis again on process, something I know firsthand MD is very familiar with. Whether it is developing a concept, business model, or executing an idea a solid design process is crucial. I have been on the other side of the table trying to pitch ideas to a VC or company, and you can tell they just don't have the passion of the idea, and that means a lot. Passion and inspiration are what will get you through trying times or help you make difficult decisions. Without that passion, it doesn't matter how great the idea or how big the opportunity, if you are not excited you can't always see the big picture. This is why Napoleon sold what is now 15% of the US for 3 cents and acre and Tim Paterson sold 86-Dos to Microsoft for $50,000, they just weren't interested in working on something together, they weren't passionate about the big picture.