If we start making these documents too easy to read lawyers across the country will be out on the streets begging for work! Health insurance, auto loans, mortgage agreements, credit card statements and even something as simple and crucial as a drug prescription can be overwhelming for the most educated consumer. Innovation and education take time from both parties to engage in constructive dialog, but can prove to save money, heartache, and even lives. One of the biggest lessons I have learned from being a designer is that while I might understand a blueprint after reviewing it for ten minutes a client could have it for ten days and still not know what is going on. We need to be able to drop the 'designer' (lawyer, doctor, architect, etc) talk, and engage consumers on a more simplistic level. No matter how great a design may be, it is as only as affective as the first time user perceives it.
The Insurance Industry Must Break the Language Barrier
Categories: Culture Innovation Discussion Financial Services Healthcare New Products, Services, and Business Models
We’ve examined how specific industries keep getting in their own way when it comes to innovation, and how a central problem within that blockage continues to be language.
Here's the rundown for the Insurance Industry:
Insurance companies are stuck in their own jar, they speak in a language few understand, and this creates consumer confusion (or worse, disdain). And the result of this confusion? Inaction. Consumers are confused with the jargon. As a result, they simply don’t act — or they take their business elsewhere. We understand that there are legal requirements, brand needs and channel limitations that constrict our ability to change, but isn’t there a better way to communicate with consumers?
While innovation is filling an unmet consumer need with a product, service or business model that is effectively communicated in the market, the message for the insurance industry is clear: Speaking to, not at the consumer is innovative in and of itself. And the evidence supporting this need for innovation? It’s everywhere — from consumers to company numbers.
In fact, in a recent study, seven out of ten insurance firms failed to produce Explanations of Benefit (EOBs) that provide a basic level of understandability.
You and I may have figured out how to decipher our EOBs, but can a consumer who is new to the insurance industry pick up and understand the same material? More importantly, how could most consumers hope to make extremely important choices regarding their insurance without going great lengths to first understand the industry’s jargon — interpret, and then apply it?
They can’t.
But there’s a silver lining here: The opportunity. Insurance firms that can effectively communicate their offering will be a leg ahead of those that continue to ignore this unmet consumer need.
But will fixing the language problem solve everything?
Of course not. We know a lot has to go right to successfully launch in market — and communication is just once piece of it. But we're willing to bet that the first insurance company to really crack this code, the firm that really speaks in everyday consumer language — will definitely make a splash. And the once-confused consumers? They will reward that company with their business. At a minimum, at least they'll understand what they're buying.
Maddock Douglas will be diving deep into the communication gap in 2010 and beyond— so stay tuned for a groundbreaking study on language in Financial Services and Insurance markets this spring.
Read More In: Culture Innovation Discussion Financial Services Healthcare New Products, Services, and Business Models
Thought leadership on innovation and the future of your industry from Maddock Douglas - The Agency of Innovation.
Click here to follow us on Twitter
It is in the insurance company interest from their perspective not to be transparent and their lawyers will not allow an honest dialogue to happen between the company experts and consumers through social networking channels. From a legal and legacy perspective it is unlikely established carriers will change their ways. I've been thinking for the past few years how powerful a new breed of insurance company would be that aligns the entire business with consumer need. The inherent conflict because of the need to price and manage risk will still conflict with customer satisfaction but my belief is that a transparent consumer friendly carrier will destroy the competition. Wouldn't you switch? I would right away. If a company clearly explained to me in a social forum why they won't be able to underwrite a certain risk and allow consumer to comment it will humanize the company and improve their relationship with consumers. Is it possible this could actually happen?
Since I work in insurance as an actuary, although not health insurance, I can maybe offer a different perspective. A lot of companies don't sell directly to consumers because individuals don't buy health insurance. They market to agents who then in turn market the product. The agent then sells this product to either individuals or companies. The advantage of going through the agent is that the agent can sell products from multiple companies. It's not common to sell insurance to individuals also not cost effective so now agents are focusing on selling to companies. Sometimes these companies are professional employer organizations (PEO). These companies basically shop around for benefits that smaller companies can offer to their employees. So now we have 3 middlemen before the actual insurance reaches the consumer: The agent, the PEO, and the employer. Each middleman collects a fee down the way of course. With this many layers, it's not easy for the insurance company to explain coverage forms to the actual insureds.
Unfortunately, the government provides disincentives for the insurance companies to eliminate the middlemen and sell directly to consumers. I looked into opting out of my company health plans and getting my own because I'm young and healthy, but the tax deductibility of the employer health care gave it a huge leg up. If your employer offers health care, you are not allowed to deduct individually purchased health care. The insurance company might as well keep on selling products through their agents.
Now on transparency, every single form that insurance companies use is on file with your state insurance department and is available for public viewing. Not only that, your state insurance department approves those forms as being fair and understandable. The #1 reason these aren't very readable is that any ambiguity in the policy is ruled in favor of the individual. That means the wording in your policy and forms need to be extremely precise. Even then, lawyers are knocking at the insurance company doors every day. Another reason that these forms are complex is that your state insurance department isn't doing their job in mandating the forms being easily understandable. The state of Florida requires that every form have a Flesch ease of reading score under a certain level.
In terms of insurance profitability, generally between 70 to 90 cents on your dollar goes to paying losses. This is known as the loss ratio. The other 10-30 cents pay expenses to get business and the remaining goes to profit/(loss). I found a page showing commissions at 9% for health insurance. http://www.or.regence.com/agent/commission/individual/ This obviously varies by company and by state, but let's call this 10 cents on the dollar to make things simpler. Now there's 20 cents on the dollar left to pay expenses. Servicing the claims requires a lot of staff so lets say this is another 10 cents. There's 10 more cents left to pay the salaries and profit. If I have to guess, about 5 cents is left after paying salaries. So now the insurance company is only making a 5% profit from writing insurance. It's a pretty meager amount if you ask me. Since the insurance company collects money up front and pays it out later, it does have the chance to invest that money. A good insurance company needs 10% of investment income to get a 15% profit which would be low compared to the Fortune 500 companies.
People tend to find alternative ways to combat this quite challenging situation. Everyone tries to save money by all means. Some people used to save money on insurance. Let's take the "green insurance" for instance. It is simply an add-on or rider added to an existing home insurance policy. These riders increase the monthly cost of general homeowners insurance. In the case of an event where the home is damaged or destroyed, the insurance rider pays out the additional cost it takes to make the repairs in a "green" way. This includes everything from recycling building materials to rebuilding in a LEED-certified manner. Source: Doing the math on green insurance


RSS