create counter

Insurance Industry Missing a Key Segment: Single Women

The 2010 census will tell us that a staggering number of households do not have children living in them. And a large number of these households are comprised of single people—many of them women. Does this mean the American family is in decline?

It depends on how you define family... or American.

The insurance industry has often characterized the ideal client in terms of traditional values and makeup, and if households are different than the ideal, are they now B or C clients? Well, if you define an unmet consumer need as protecting the futures of children and spouses, perhaps. But is that all there is to protect?

Ask any single woman under 50 with no kids this question:

Is there anyone in your life that you want to leave something to?

You will probably get answers like: nieces, nephews, godchildren, charities, brothers, sisters, colleges, causes and the like—maybe even parents.

But are these worthy financial goals? Who is to judge? Do these women have money? Will they have more in the future? Do they want their lives to have meant something after they are gone?

Ask them.

If they say yes, how can insurance companies reach them?

Better question: Are any insurance companies reaching them now?

Answer: Not yet.

Last question: Who’s going to start?

Have you seen the new Maddock Douglas homepage?

Follow Maddock Douglas on Twitter

Read More In: Culture Innovation Discussion Financial Services New Products, Services, and Business Models Innovation Community Ideas

Thought leadership on innovation and the future of your industry from Maddock Douglas - The Agency of Innovation.

Click here to follow us on Twitter


Tags : 2010 Censusinnovation in insuranceinsurance industryunmet consumer need


Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-2 of 2 | Latest Comment

July 16, 2010 12:44 AM

It is very interesting and surprising this market hasn't been tapped. You forgot to add animal shelters and cats to the list of places they might want to give to. I would totally pay to protect my cat. (I am kidding). But I'd pay to protect assets that could be passed on to niece.

July 16, 2010 12:00 PM

Funny you should mention the cat. There are more assets being left in "pet trusts" for estate planning purposes than ever before. Even though you were kidding, you are on the right track. The "niece/nephew/godchild" etc is a big deal. I am in the same boat. I don't have kids of my own but it doesn't mean there isn't someone I care about protecting.

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-2 of 2 | Latest Comment

Add Your Reply

(will not be displayed)

Email me when comments are added to this thread

 
 

Please log in or register to participate in this community!

Log In

Remember

Not a member? Sign up!

Did you forget your password?

You can also log in using OpenID.

close this window
close this window