Thanks for this column, Maria. My mentor at the beginning of my career in the mid '70's was a Peter Drucker admirer who attributed the "What business are you really in?" question to him -- citing just the railroads example. Nevertheless, I am grateful to you for reminding me of how lucky I was to begin my career in communications and strategic marketing within the insurance industry under the tutelage of someone who began our work with that fundamental question. He and I would follow up that core question with three other questions that our clients probably can repeat decades after he and I left the company:
1. Who is your audience?
2. What are your objectives?
3. How will we know whether you (and they) achieved your objectives?
Some time after we both left that communications department, I ran into a former client. I asked how the folks in the department were doing at serving his needs. He unhappily said, "They do exactly what we tell them to do." Surprised a bit, I asked him what was wrong with that, and he replied, "You guys used to make us think, which meant we did the right thing the right way. I really miss those grillings."
Persistently asking the right questions is at the core of consultative services. It is especially crucial when folks start to talk about innovation. If we can't get a credible answer to a simple "Why are we doing this innovation?" question, limited resources are doomed to be wasted before the heavy lifting even begins. Being a "professional three year old" right at the start of a strategy's development is sometimes underappreciated as a tool to increase productivity, profits, employee retention and customer loyalty.
Thanks again. By the way, I called my mentor about 25 years after our careers had gone in different directions. I specifically wanted to thank him for drumming those core principles into my brain, pointing out to him that I had applied them to work in government relations, marketing research, and strategic marketing. I've asked those questions of Fortune 500 clients and small nonprofits.
True to form, Joe laughed, said something appropriately unprintable, then thanked me for the call and for staying committed to those questions.
Consider thanking your mentors for what you are now sharing with us. It'll be good for all concerned.
Bob Adler
www.adler-strategic-marketing.com
What Business Are Insurance Companies REALLY In?
Categories: Culture Financial Services Future Trends New Products, Services, and Business Models Innovation Community Ideas
Theodore Levitt wrote a famous paper on the subject of Marketing Myopia in the 1960’s at the beginning of the modern marketing movement. After re-reading an excerpt, it became clear to me that the insurance industry can benefit from a little "Lasik surgery" in this regard. Having spent many years in the insurance business, it's easier to see this from the outside looking in.
Marketing Myopia occurs when company leaders define their mission too narrowly, resulting in business nearsightedness or shortsightedness.
Hindsight Is 20/20
Levitt describes a few classic examples of industries that shrank or faded away because of marketing myopia. These include the well examined Buggy Whip industry, and also Railroads, Hollywood, Oil and others. While not all extinct, each suffered and/or came close to the brink at one point. Levitt and others have suggested that more visionary thinking would have defined their purpose more broadly such as:
| Industry | Myopic Purpose | The Real Purpose |
| Buggy Whip Manufacturer | Making Buggy Whips | Transportation “Starter” |
| Railroads | Train Travel | Transportation |
| Hollywood | Movies | Entertainment |
| Oil | Petroleum | Energy |
| Dry Cleaning | Safe, effective cleaning of wool garments | Making clothes ready to wear |
On the flip side, Levitt cites a few examples of industries that have thrived for centuries by remaining thoroughly customer focused. These include nylon, glass and aluminum (DuPont, Corning, Kaiser and Reynolds). He also points out a valid argument: these are unfair comparisons due to relative product diversity, which is the precise way myopic errors are committed. Levitt says it isn’t about opportunity, it is about “managerial imaginativeness” and audacity.
From Myopia to “Out of the Box” to “Out of the Jar"
Facing significant scrutiny, regulation, commoditization, and ho hum growth, can the insurance industry broaden it's purpose before it’s too late? We typically hear the purpose defined as manufacturing and selling insurance products for lives, property, disability, health, dental, legal, and various “exotic risks”. I’ve heard many define thing slightly more broadly as “protection”, but could there be an even broader purpose? What do people REALLY want when they acquire insurance?
How about the Lifestyle Continuity business? I define this as the avoidance or reduction of disruption that occurs when something tragic or very inconvenient happens along the path of daily life for a definable segment (individuals, families, generations, businesses, organizations, communities, networks, countries). By redefining the insurance industry in this broad manner, what new product, service, or business model possibilities open up? Can you think of any?
If you can't, it may be time to put on a pair of glasses.
Have you seen the new Maddock Douglas homepage?
Follow Maddock Douglas on Twitter
Read More In: Culture Financial Services Future Trends New Products, Services, and Business Models Innovation Community Ideas
Thought leadership on innovation and the future of your industry from Maddock Douglas - The Agency of Innovation.
Click here to follow us on Twitter
Maria,
As I am in the process of establising an insurance intermediary (www.rentalcarexcess.com.au), I found your article particularly interesting.
After negotiating what I thought were quite simple supply agreements with underwriters over the past 6 months, I believe myopia is alive and well. I would suggest a new culture of indifference is becoming the bedfellow of myopia.
Our mission is to be the major rental car excess insurance company in Australia, This product type is a new product type for Australia, which offeres significant potential NEW revenue for underwriters. It has taken us 6 months just to obtain 2 prices. The majority of Australian underwriters were too indifferent to even bother quoting.
The upside I see is that anyone who is able to push through the myopic indifference will have a long market lead time. Most insurance companies are unable or unwilling to respond to emerging opportunities.
Regards
Marcus Tarrant
Rental Car Excess
Hi Maria,
Thanks for your article. Very interesting, and to the point.
When there is risk, there is an opportunity. I work in actuarial consulting business - not far from insurance really. We work with pension, health, and other risks, as well as other mathy things that no one else wants to look at.
Lifestyle Continuity is a nice phrase for the customers. Nowadays, managing risk is one of the big things when it comes to having a smooth continuous lifestyle. Of course, in 2008 people wished they had bought some insurance on their 401k and investment accounts.
What I am curious though, is your last question. I am going to rephrase it (and/or expand it). Risk can be a very general term to describe everything that threatens our lifestyle. This I am very familiar with. What else though, besides risk, can be a threat to having an uninterrupted lifestyle. I am sure there are other things out there, I just cannot think of any right now.
Back to risk though. There are two ways of managing risk. One is on the individual level, and this is where insurance products come in. An individual can pay a small premium into a big pool, and when something happens, get back a significantly larger sum back from this pool. Insurance companies determine premiums based on the risk being insured. Nice model really. It goes way back, when villages and communities would combine resources and efforts to help out one unfortunate member.
Another way is on a corporate level. How do insurance companies, for example manager risk. Or big corporations. One solution, price all the insurance products right in the first place. Another one, balance various risks. For example, sell annuities and life insurance - this way the mortality risk is hedged. Another example, sell home insurance, and invest in construction business. Things like that. Finally, a third solution, is to make sure you are always covered for the present value of your risk. This is, for example, what companies have to do with their pension plans.
Don't worry, there is a point to all of this. Back to your question of new ideas and products. What would it take for these large corporations and insurance companies to change the way they look at risk and the way the deal with it. If one comes up with a new way to ensure Lifestyle Continuity, then there will have to be adjustments on the business side as well.
Am I making sense, or am I just babbling at this point?
Thanks!
Sasha
Bob, thank you for the "professional 3 year old" comment. Priceless.
And Marcus, it sounds like myopia has you a bit frustrated but it is also an opportunity. Maybe some innovation will help that long quoting process. I we can help, let us know!
Sasha, you make good sense (no babbling worries!). I agree there needs to be an adjustment on the business side. However not all innovations in lifestyle continuity need to be traditional insurance products. That's the expansion of the purpose. Just like movies became entertainment. Risk products become lifestyle continuity products. So for example, if the industry defined their purpose like that back in the day, we may have invented smoke alarms, mammograms, prenuptual agreements and roadside assistance. :) Make sense?
Got it. Risk products need to become something other than just measuring risk. It's about prevention, advance warning, and solutions to an already problematic situation. And of course, many more things that we cannot think of right now.
Thank you! This was a very insightful article!
Thank you!! Please stay tuned for more like this...if you have any ideas about this later, please let us know!!
View unverified member's comment - posted by Harry C.
Thanks Harry for your inquiry. You raise valid thoughts. The point I am making is that any industry is vulnerable to going the way of the buggy whips if they don't define their business in terms of what they do versus what the product is. People don't buy drill bits because they want drill bits. They buy them because they want a hole.
This is far greater than renaming or cosmetics. In fact, cosmetics alone would never create demand because the offering and benefit must be believable, to your point. I have been in the insurance field for a long time too, and while I agree that there has been a lot of product evolution, there has been very little in the way of "revolutionary" concepts and ideas that superimpose a new upward curve on demand and consequently public opinion. That's our definition of innovation. It's much more than a new "twist". While the people working in the industry see the benefits clearly and the public good that is provided, the public has a generally negative view of insurance companies. It is why others (ie government) are stepping in to make the radical change that is perceived to be needed, first in healthcare. I see the same happening in other branches of insurance beyond healthcare for sure. There are many who believe the government is not the best place to have this innovation stem from. Who should be the one to initiate the change, the insurance industry or someone else? Innovation and innovative thinking is the path to figuring it out.
Maria,
Excellent article. I think you hit the nail right on the head by letting us know that the industry needs help. I really like your views and I think that the industry needs to be the ones to step back and re-evaluate itself before we are not needed. I am a 30 year old insurance agent so I can see the gen y's perspective and the insurance fields lack of perspective. Insurance needs a spark and I think now is a great time to do it with all of the change going on.
Brandon
Thanks...we are here to help leaders lead on this...Would love to know more about your perspective on what needs to change. Don't be bashful. We are not. We are telling the industry whatever we can that can be helpful, even if it isn't pleasant. I spent too many years in the business to see it get taken over by someone else....
Very relevant article. Thanks.
BTW, we see this also in many other industries: automotive immediately comes to mind. Fundamental innovation has not happened since early 1900s when it comes to the product itself - the internal combustion engine. All we have seen is what can only be termed as "creeping incrementalism".
In reality as marketers, how would you go about convincing someone that they need innovative solutions? Our company has developed an innovative means for measuring complexity in products and processes. We have been getting blank stares from the insurance industry when we approach them and offer them a means to address something as fundamental as managing complexity.
Blank stares. I can see that as well...
Unfortunately (or fortunately) there are only a few leaders in the industry that probably embrace the idea of innovative solutions versus the incremental. Even though incremental is important too. The way the others get convinced is in the rear view mirror. So someone bold has to have had a level of success before others jump on. The good news is, it only takes a few to lead change. The key is consumer focus. The industry is very distribution focused which isn't a bad thing, it just isn't enough.
It's not just someone else that's taking over the business, it's the government. That's huge. Radical reform calls for counter revolution.
View unverified member's comment - posted by Rick5758


RSS