create counter

How Would Grandma Describe It? - Language as an Area for Innovation

A few days after the recent Goldman Sachs story broke, I was asked how Synthetic CDOs worked, and I didn’t really know.

I found a tutorial on line that gave a “simplified” diagram and narrative. It was around 8 minutes long.

As I watched Goldman Sachs’ CEO talk to the senate panel in DC several days ago, I was struck by how complex and confusing his answers sounded when asked about many issues, including the operation of these instruments. Needless to say, it was awfully difficult to explain how buying this exposure is in the best interests of investors when the issuer is on the opposite side of the table. The fact that Goldman was betting against the market was an easy soundbyte. The part about how the investment was supposed to work; not so much.

That's not to say complex products are bad for consumers, however it is an excellent opening for an innovator to capture market opportunity when there is a communication disconnect.

In our research, we are finding that words used everyday in the finance and insurance industry are either not understood at all, or associated with something unrelated, particularly with millenials.

For example, in a recent proprietary qualitative study where respondents were asked to define the word “annuity”, none were able to do so correctly, and only 33% said something even remotely in the ballpark. And when asked to associate the word “premium”, almost 60% associated it with something completely unrelated to insurance, such as sports tickets or a high end car (why is it called a premium, anyway?).

So products, services and ways of doing business can be laden with confusion, and clearing that smoke is an opportunity to gain attention and more business. Granted, changing language isn’t that easy in a highly regulated industry, but if it is for public good, there is never more receptivity than at the present time for financial literacy and a breakthrough in understanding.

What are the best ways to find these disconnects and turn them into opportunities?

  1. Lean into the misunderstanding – Look for the places where people go “huh?”. Look also for the emotions that go along with it. Do they feel stupid or ashamed? Do they get angry at the communicator? Are they just truly indifferent? Do they really want to know the answer?
  2. Find what IS understood – Research here is important. Find out what they do understand about it, even if it is incorrect. Look for the benefits that they took away, listen to what words they use to describe it. Pay attention to what makes the “lightbulb” go off. A great test is to ask your grandmother, grandfather or a child under 10. (unless you have grandparents in finance)
  3. Build a Bridge – This is where you create a new way to communicate the product in a way that people “get it”. Make sure it is a bridge to the purpose for the product and not to something that is just easy to latch onto. For example, if it’s an investment offering, it should be about the philosophy, management and time horizon, not about the past returns. Otherwise, confusion is bound to get even worse when the performance isn’t there.

It's no easy task, but great opportunities are never easy. Having a good process for discovering the insight, developing and testing the ideas and communicating them is key.

Have you seen the new Maddock Douglas homepage?

Follow Maddock Douglas on Twitter

Read More In: News, Rumors, Gossip, & Trends Innovation Discussion Financial Services New Products, Services, and Business Models Innovation Community Ideas

Thought leadership on innovation and the future of your industry from Maddock Douglas - The Agency of Innovation.

Click here to follow us on Twitter



Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-5 of 5 | Latest Comment

May 7, 2010 12:44 PM

I think one of the big issues here is not just how to talk to millenials, but trying to figure out what to talk to them about. Take a credit card statement for example, ten pages of 7 point font about terms and agreements. Not only are most people not interested in reading it, they are frustrated that the credit card companies are wasting so much paper. (kind of a catch -22 here) But for arguments sake, let's assume you teamed up with a great graphic designer and came up with an easy to read, easy to understand diagram explaining interest rates, policy, terms, etc. We probably still are going to trash it...call me when something goes wrong and we will deal with it then. After all we are the same generation that when asked to program the time on the VCR in 1992 didn't reach for the instructions, but the remote to start mashing buttons.
What would happen if I got a credit card in the mail and was forced to go online to activate my card and in the process I was 'forced' to answer a few questions and/ or watch a sort video explaining some of the features of the card? Then I was instantly given access to my online account which I could link to my bank account, download the ipod app to check my balance on the go, etc. All of these programs are now linked together and instead of sending me mail twice a week that I just shred, I get updates and account changes instantly.
A big portion of the problem is the language (points 1 and 2 above), but I think the biggest disconnect is communication. If this makes any sense, we need to force information upon millenials but make it seem like it was their choice to read it. While it sounds like trying to get a five year old to eat their vegetables, I think that it is about choice and interaction. A school teacher once told my mom that when I got in trouble she needed to give me choices for my punishment, I was five and she was not happy about having a debate with a kid that just left class to go take extra recess. I usually took extra school work instead of missing TV, but somehow when I was doing math problems I felt like I won and so did she.

May 9, 2010 6:42 AM

Brilliant, once again, Adam! You are spot on. This is "pull" vs "push". When someone is wanting the information and eager to learn the "why", the info sticks. When you have to memorize it or in some way feel "tested" resentment builds.

Years ago, Maddock Douglas helped AT&T redesign their billing to dramatically improve the customer experience. While I was not there at the time, I believe there was quite a positive stir, including Wall Street Journal press, about it. I will see if our CEO would like to comment on it...

And your point about intuitive versus reading directions...I couldn't agree more.
Wouldn't it be great if a requirement for new products and services is that it needed to be intuitive so you could get something immediately without having to read the directions?

Nice! Love your metaphors... Keep chiming in, your comments are quite valuable.

BEst,
Maria

May 10, 2010 4:22 PM

Adam,

As Maria mentioned we did help redesign the billing experience for Ameritech/SBC/AT&T. At the time, there was indeed tremendous opportunity to create an experience that was aligned with the needs of their customers. Delivering on these wishes within the constraints of the technology while meeting the objectives of various departments within Ameritech was a heady, fun challenge.

There has been much debate lately about the difference between innovation and invention. If you want to innovate, find a need and solve it with a unique product, service or business model. If you want someone to buy your innovation, be careful to communicate with them in an evocative, appropriate way.

The billing experience we created was rated as the "most preferred" bill. You know you have done a good job communicating when someone says they like their bill.

Mike

May 10, 2010 9:05 PM

Mike,
I would imagine innovation, in any industry, can be a difficult sell to companies and consumers. Standard operating procedures make people feel safe even if small changes could make big differences, and sometimes it is easier to get someone to take three baby steps instead of one regular step. I think this speaks to the importance of your comment on appropriate dialogue in order to encourage innovation.
Thanks for the dialogue,
Adam

May 10, 2010 9:25 PM

I like how you refer to something other than a small change as a "regular" step. While innovation isn't necessarily on the forefront of the minds of all leaders, it takes just a few to make a difference. We like to characterize the difference between the "baby" and "regular" steps as evolutionary vs revolutionary. Baby steps take you slowly in a direction. Revolution pushed the hyperspace button. We are involved in both but specialize more in the latter. Evolutionary change is already going on in most organizations. Its important. Its the next thing. Revolutionary takes forces from outside, usually.

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Back to Top | Comments 1-5 of 5 | Latest Comment

Add Your Reply

(will not be displayed)

Email me when comments are added to this thread

 
 

Please log in or register to participate in this community!

Log In

Remember

Not a member? Sign up!

Did you forget your password?

You can also log in using OpenID.

close this window
close this window