create counter

6 Advantages of Using Sustainability Communities to Learn From Failure

Cities cover only 3% of the world's land mass, but they house 50% of the world's population, consume 75% of the world's resources and emit a corresponding proportion of greenhouse gases.

Statistics like that make a convincing case for green innovation.

But can planners, engineers, politicians and bureaucrats create a culture of learning and innovation focused on sustainability? There are daunting barriers to overcome - lack of time, funding, human resources, clarity, passion and cooperation, to name a few.

Sustainable Cities is an NGO (Non-Government Organization) that has helped cities bridge these barriers. In fact, it has pioneered a network that accelerates city-to-city learning.

Using the network, cities have created a 'safe space' where they can connect and learn from each other's failures and triumphs. The advantages are compelling:

  1. Lower costs associated with knowledge acquisition
  2. Peer-to-peer learning - building capacities, rather than building consultancies
  3. A common 'memory' of best / failed practices, archived for the benefit of all
  4. Creation of a culture that nurtures flexibility
  5. Elimination of silos
  6. Breaking down the use of knowledge as a tool of power and control, instead making it a tool of communal empowerment.

Unsurprisingly, the learning network has grown to 40 cities in 14 countries, with some real green innovation results to back it.

Imagine a sustainable city

Imagine Calgary and Imagine Durban were two projects that grew from the network. In each city, thousands of citizens were engaged to create a blueprint that would lead to a more sustainable, socially equitable community.

Imagine Calgary was one of the largest community visioning and consultation processes of its kind in the world. The project brought together citizens, corporations, community agencies and the local government - an ecosystem that engendered an atmosphere of innovation and collaboration.

Today, it is still going strong, and continues to influence the civic planning of the rapidly growing city.

Back to the future

Now let's shift gears.

I had the good fortune to work on a land development project with Andres Duany. Duany, author of Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream, is a champion of New Urbanism, the movement to make cities more sustainable, more civic-minded, and more humane.

What surprised me about New Urbanism was that it was essentially a copy of old European urbanism.

It proffered ideas like building a city around a central structure (a church or city hall); zoning for residential and commercial in single buildings; encouraging urban food production; creating housing that allowed rich and poor, old and young to live comfortably side by side; and creating roads that encouraged pedestrian and bicycle traffic.

Benefits included reduced traffic / congestion / smog, increased production of local food, and savings in energy consumption. The benefits as far as community-building and civic engagement are equally impressive.

All from green innovation that's been with us for over a thousand years.

But the real beauty of New Urbanism is that - unlike a new technology - it presents us with models for living that we're already familiar with. In a sense, it takes us back to the villages of our forefathers, even as it solves our very modern sustainability problems.

Look forward, look back

It is possible to build cities that are more sustainable and humane.

The process can can be accelerated by sharing learnings more freely, using technology like the Sustainable Cities network. It can also be accelerated by giving our citizens options they feel familiar with, as with New Urbanism.

The enemy of progress in both cases is lack of information and collaboration. It's a hindrance to innovation that is pervasive, whether we're talking about improving cities or improving breakfast cereal.

In short, if we're going to teach our cities to be green, first we have to teach our planners, engineers, regulators, architects and consumers how to communicate and work together.

This article originally published in The Huffington Post

Have you seen the new Maddock Douglas homepage?

Follow Maddock Douglas on Twitter

Read More In: News, Rumors, Gossip, & Trends Culture Innovation Discussion Sustainability Innovation Community Ideas

Thought leadership on innovation and the future of your industry from Maddock Douglas - The Agency of Innovation.

Click here to follow us on Twitter



Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-4 of 4 | Latest Comment

June 1, 2010 11:37 AM

Everything is a cycle. As you say, the new urbanism is in fact the European model, and was touted in the 1970's as the way to organize and build sustainable urban places. I also remember the catch phrase was 'sense of place, sense of scale'.
Then the economy got away on everyone and now we are looking at what we didn't do but know how to do, and deciding we should try again. In fact, Jane Jacobs and Lewis Mumford are being quoted.
What would it take to start actually doing it?
There are other issues: There is the practical one of working or blending in/fixing the mistakes of the past decades, and dealing with the climates issues. Sometimes you have to take snow storms into account. What works in the American South isn't really practical in the frozen Canadian North.

June 1, 2010 12:17 PM

Margaret,

Thanks for your insightful comments.

Interesting point about things in the south not necessarily working in the north. I lived in both Northern Europe (Germany) and Soutern Asia (Hong Kong) and saw awesome communities in both. Rich and poor together, young and old, multi-use zoning, fresh food markets, etc etc etc. Sure, things aren't identical. But I truly believe we can do better than sprawling suburbs where you have to drive 20 minutes to get a coffee.

I believe what we'll need to start up with New Urbanism is growing dissatisfaction with the suburban status quo, and word of mouth that there is a better way. I'm seeing it happen already here in Vancouver - we actually have a phenomenon of 'reverse rush hour', where more people are heading out of downtown in the morning (where they live) than are heading in! That means more an more people are opting for a tighter, more communal, less smog-causing, downtown existence. Check out 'eco-density Vancouver' for more on that one.

Keep up the great comments!

Cheers

M

June 1, 2010 1:23 PM

Marc,
I also see a reverse rush hour in some cities. What I am afraid of is that there will be fanatics (as exist in one place I could mention) who only want a 100% car-less community which of course is not practical. Over 1/3 of the market is actually in the surrounding countryside on the farm - travel distance for some services 2 hours by car. Make that a carless community? Nope - particularly not in the winter.
Balance and choice come to mind. Where the old fashioned Euro-style community suits - fine, but leave a choice for those whose career and lifestyle choices have needs better met by another community planning style.
About 15 years ago, I sat in on a planning presentation where the houses fronted the streets and the garages were off a laneway at the back (The model was Seaside in the southern US and a community in Virgina). My questions were: 1- Who owns the laneway and is therefore responsible for upkeep and plowing? (Duh, hadn't thought of that) AND How does one get to the house from the garage 50 feet away at 11.00pm when one has been at work all day, it's dark and there has been a blizzard and the path is blocked? (Need a covered walkway-oops-there's another one we hadn't thought of).
So, what I am saying is that things need to be taken one project at a time, with the goal of a liveable city for all. It can't be insular and it has to take the existing structure and make it work into the new urbanism as well - you can't abandon it.

June 2, 2010 12:38 AM

Great insights.

The anecdote that I always use is 'it took us a few hundred years of industrialization to get our world into this state...we aren't going to get out in 15.'

That said, we have to push for solutions. That's the reason I'm excited to be working in the field of innovation - our mandate is change.

I don't intend to get discouraged, or to slow down my push for better solutions. Hope you keep your energy and innovative spirit in high gear as well.

Cheers

M

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-4 of 4 | Latest Comment

Add Your Reply

(will not be displayed)

Email me when comments are added to this thread

 
 

Please log in or register to participate in this community!

Log In

Remember

Not a member? Sign up!

Did you forget your password?

You can also log in using OpenID.

close this window
close this window