I would actually add a few points to your letter. I think it is an infringement upon my rights to have my speech limited to what they (corporate america) deems appropriate. Let me also remind all those that may read these words that as a registered rep many rights are taken away from you. Why should we report what we give to any political party? This is an outrage and completely illegal. I would like to challenge these laws in the courts. I think it is an outrage that we are considered guilty first which is definitely a violation of our civil rights. We must toe the line so to speak even if we think the EMT may have definite holes in it. I say we join together to fight the madness.
U5-ia*: Free Speech for Financial Services Professionals
Categories: Culture Innovation Discussion Financial Services New Products, Services, and Business Models Innovation Community Ideas
*For any of you who are not in the securities field who might be reading this, the U5 is the form that broker dealers use to terminate registered reps.
The U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights numero uno says that:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
But of course this does not really apply to social media for anyone who wants to keep their securities license.
While I will NOT say that broker dealers are in any way infringing upon any inalienable rights, FINRA and their interpretation of it sure makes it unattractive to say what you really think to a bunch of people who may be willing to listen. It’s not against the law, but it is just so darn difficult.
That’s why March 15, 2010 was my independence day. That is the day I left the world of being a registered rep and principal, and joined a firm that wanted me to think about new ideas, write about them, and get people to think. No revolutionary ideas ever come from having your thoughts proofread and scrubbed for anything promissory or ungrounded.
Not only can I write about hunches and things that have not yet been proven, but, more importantly, I can use the social media channels without concern that what I write must be edited by someone whose job it is to protect a bigger entity against my rogue behavior.
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
I get it, having been on both sides of that story as a former insurance company officer. Deposed. Interrogated. Audited. It’s no fun. People love to sue big companies as a result of what individuals do.
But what does this say about the financial services industry’s ability to reinvent itself? And don’t tell me you don’t think it needs it. There would be no such phrase as “financial reform” if the public at large wasn’t in agreement.
So if the professionals have to weigh their words carefully, or give up their licenses or corporate responsibilities so they don’t have to do that, what will the future of advice look like? Dave Ramsey? Oprah? Suze? Me? Your parents? Yikes. That’s crazy. It sounds an awful lot like what is happening in the medical field with malpractice concerns. Professionals are relegated to “time-out” while unlicensed and inexperienced pundits can say whatever they want in the world of social media, and people listen. Then they form opinions that ultimately those same professionals have to unravel. I am “ascared.”
Where is the trust? How can we give the industry’s culture a makeover? Who will innovate around this one?
Read More In: Culture Innovation Discussion Financial Services New Products, Services, and Business Models Innovation Community Ideas
Thought leadership on innovation and the future of your industry from Maddock Douglas - The Agency of Innovation.
Click here to follow us on Twitter
John, I feel your frustration, I had it too (of course until now). It is one of those really weird and unintended byproducts of an industry that has so little consumer trust. That's really where it stems from. While fighting in court may help in the short term, the longer term solution has to be fixing the problem of how the consumer perceives the industry. Otherwise, it will keep rearing its ugly head in other ways that curtail what you can communicate. I agree we need to join together in the quest to get it done.
thanks so much for writing.
tony said: Your site is good Actually, i have seen your post and That was very informative and very entertaining for me. Thanks for posting Really Such Things. I should recommend your site to my friends. Cheers.
Thank you, Tony. You made my day. Cheers!


RSS
View unverified member's comment - posted by John 1